The current SDGP-70 proposal covers only users that were holding vsdCRV on Arbitrum during the exploit.
When the price of vsdCRV was floored due to the exploit, the price of asdCRV was also floored due to the two tokens sharing a single liquidity pool with CRV.
This caused users with asdCRV Illamalend positions on Arbitrum to be liquidated.
I am proposing expand SDGP’s compensation to users that request a refund for their liquidated asdCRV Illamalend positions on Arbitrum that were caused by the vsdCRV exploit.
Hello, nice proposal, I suggest everyone with an affected address in this case should post a comment in this thread with the affected address within one week. We can review each address’ P&L linked to the hack, and propose a second wave of compensation.
Reviewed all 57 addresses that ever borrowed on the Arbitrum asdCRV llamalend market.
Losses were measured in asdCRV units using Curve’s own on-chain accounting (soft-liquidation loss counters, plus equity seized in hard liquidations at the pre-exploit oracle price).
Total exploit-attributable losses: ~17,681 sdCRV across 5 addresses.
Same rules as the LP program: allocations under 100 sdCRV excluded, positions opened after the exploit excluded, positions that stayed healthy lost nothing.