SDGP-78: Add a 4% vlSDT Revenue Share to Liquid Lockers

Author : James Nexus, CurveYield Developer

Summary

This is a proposal to share 4% of all Stake DAO Liquid Locker revenue with vlSDT stakers.

It’s funded by a 3% increase in Liquid Locker fees and a 1% reduction in the Liquid Locker Treasury fee — leaving an even split: 4% to the Treasury, 4% to vlSDT stakers.

At current token values and locker revenue, this adds approximately +3.5% APR to vlSDT staking.

Now Proposed
sdCRV/CRV LP 10% 10%
Treasury share 5% 4%
vlSDT staker share 4%
Harvest fee 0.1% 0.1%
Total Liquid Locker fee 15.1% 18.1%

Motivation

Liquid Lockers are one of Stake DAO’s most exceptional and innovative products, consistently offering some of the best yield rates in DeFi. Stake DAO is a true DAO, which makes vlSDT stakers the effective owners of the protocol — and I believe it’s a natural evolution for the owners of Stake DAO to receive a share of what its best product earns.

Implementing this revenue share would increase vlSDT yield by roughly 30% against its historical average. A significant increase, and one that moves vlSDT toward parity with Stake DAO’s other high-yielding products.

The Treasury gives up 1%, and gets more back than it loses. Stake DAO has roughly 35M SDT still to be minted or distributed. A higher vlSDT yield makes SDT more valuable, and every increase in SDT’s value increases what that remaining supply can buy — in incentives, in partnerships, in runway. Trading 1% of Liquid Locker revenue for a stronger SDT is a good trade for the Treasury on its own terms, before counting the effect of a more attractive governance asset drawing more SDT into vote-locking.

vlSDT is arguably Stake DAO’s most important product, and I’d like to see its yield reach a rate comparable to the products it makes possible.

The cost to Liquid Locker depositors

This proposal does increase the total fee on Liquid Lockers by 3%, and it’s worth being precise about what that costs a depositor.

The 3% comes out of gross locker revenue. Take a locker displaying 21.8% APR today — at a 15.1% fee, that implies gross revenue of 25.7%. Three percent of that is 0.77 points, leaving the depositor 21.03%.

Stake DAO’s Liquid Lockers routinely pay 1.5–2.5x the yield of the native tokens they’re built on. Against a margin that size, a reduction of well under a percentage point is unlikely to change where depositors put capital — the product still wins by the same wide margin it wins by today.

Specification

  1. Increase the total fee on all Liquid Lockers by 3%.

  2. Decrease the Liquid Locker Treasury fee share by 1%, to 4%.

  3. Distribute the taxed Liquid Locker rewards to vlSDT stakers as USDC or sdCRV.

Hello James,
Thanks for this very constructive proposal.

On my side, despite it being interesting and well justified, I lean towards no because it would lead us to be less competitive than convex, and since with OnlyBoost, we deposit in the most competitive venue accounting for fees and boost, we would end up loosing some fee generating TVL. Especially, when a pool is empty, it would be always more competitive to put the first dollar on Convex rather than on Stake DAO, bootstrapping the yield for them.

If there is no more debate, we can push this to a vote. Perhaps we wait till next week for other people to answer.

1 Like